What are Design Research Types and Applications?

Let’s have a think of the design practice and how design research contribute to the development of different design solutions, products, services, and systems. Both design and research are human activities and in his book, the Craftsmanship, Richard Sennett describes design as a craftsman practice that involves using different materials and elements to provide a final design solution. Over the years of working in design industry, before moving to the academia, research was integrated part of our practice as a design team. 

With a closer look to the design thinking process, we can observe that design research is a bit tricky due to the interdisciplinary nature of design. The interaction between design and research is affected by the level of the research conducted, its purpose, who is doing it, and when it is practiced in the design process. Have a think of these questions and try to reflect on your own design practice. 

What is Design Research?

Design research Is the practice of using research to inform the design practice. Designers use the different qualitative and quantitative research methods during the design thinking process. At the early stage of the design thinking (Discover), research methods can be used to collect data about the design problem, target users, and their needs. The analysis of these data can help designers to format a clear idea about the problem (Define stage) before moving to prototyping (Develop). Design research includes the co-create and testing with the user to understand their experience and improve the design solution to meet with their needs. 

Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work
Figure 1. Design Thinking book for Nigel Cross.

In his book, Design Thinking, Nigel Cross explored how different famous designers creatively design their products and how they used different types of research, in particular visual research to inform their design ideas and creative practice. While our focus in this article is the types design research and their contribution to the design practice, you can check several design research methods in the IDEO Design Toolkit which provides comprehensive guide for the different research tools and  when to use them during the design process. The aim of our discussion today is explore the connection between design and research and how they both blend seamlessly in the our daily design practice. 

The Relation Between Design and Research

Before jumping to explore the main three types of design research, it is vital to clarify the design research practice in the corporate context in general.  While some companies apply research intensively (research-based design practice), others just depend on secondary research done by others. Therefore, some premises need to be clarified regarding the clarified about this relation:

There is no design without research

As a designer, you start any design project by exploration. We start by a client brief and conduct field research to understand the design problem and the target user. Visual research presents another aspect of our research to explore different ideas.

Design and research may not happen in the same place and time

In some projects, designers receive briefs or jump directly into the development of ideas. This does not mean absence of the research element. It is simply because research was conducted in an earlier stage of previous project. Then, the current designer just apply what was found. You may notice that practice micro- or small-size design studios where they focus only on the exclusion of the creative briefs rather than contributing in forming one.

Design and research may not be conducted with the same person

Another premise to highlight is that, the person who conduct the research may not be the same person who develop the design solution. Within the team, the research could be conducted by the marketing team or others. 

Design research types can be used simultaneously

As we will explore from the different examples below, we will find out that different design research types can occur in the same project in the same time as they all blend in the design process.

The Types of Design Research

Classifying the design research and its aims is coined to Professor Christopher Frayling, The Royal Collage of Art. In his paper, Research in Art and Design, Frayling identified three types of design research in the practice; research to design, research into design, and research through design. The aim of this classification is to identify the relation between research and design in practice. So, let’s explore the each of these three types:

Design research
Figure 2. Research in Art and Design by Professor Christopher Frayling

Research to Design

This is the most commonly known type of design research. It is simply what every designer conduct before developing the final design product or service. For example, designers conduct UX research using tools such as the card sorting and Kano Model to understand how patients prioritise the different functions before designing mhealth apps to manage their weight and diet. If you would like to design a service such as improving patient experience when admitting to hospitals, we start with conducting field research and explore their experience using tools such as the consumer journey mapping to identify both pain points an gain points.

Design research in the Double Diamond
Figure 3. Research to design in the Double Diamond design thinking.

One of the practical examples of applying research to design is IKEA products. In an interview with IKEA product management, Marcus Engman, in the Dezen Magazine, he highlighted by IKEA do field research to build understanding of how consumers use different kitchenware products in their daily life. They use field study, interviews (What is Thematic Analysis? And How to Apply in Design Thinking) and observation as a research method to understand the design problem and consumer needs. 

The research to design occurs in two points in the design process. First in the exploration stage as the IKEA example, but there is another phase where research is a must to ensure the design success, which is prototype testing. The aim of research in this stage is to ensure that we designed the right thing. Collecting feedback from consumers and clients to improve the prototype before delivering the final design product. Think of A/B testing in UX research as the randomised trial is applied to explore which feature is getting more user clicks. 

IKEA design process
Figure 4. The IKEA design process for the FJÄLLBERGET chair (Source: YouTube)

Finally, after the delivery of the product, research doesn’t stop. Research contributes to getting consumer feedback after supplying the product such consumer satisfaction questionnaires, focus groups and interviews. These data can be used as research findings that can be used in future products as well. 

Research into Design

The second aspect of the design research is the research in the design practice itself, which is usually conducted by academics who investigate the design practice and how designers generate their ideas. It is a pure academic investigation that aims to build understanding of the design practice, identify its characteristics, and which route is most effective in the practice.  

Kees Dorst design reasoning
Figure 5. Design reasoning by Kees Dorst.

A good example of the research into design is the work of Kees Dorst in identifying the design problem and solution in the design thinking process in his paper, The Nature of Design Thinking, Kees Dorst investigated the design thinking practice from the reasoning aspect and how ideas are formed in the problem/solution space. He observed the design practice based on three main elements: The “What” refers to the players or the elements in the situation we would like to address, the “How” refers to the process or the method used to address these challenges, and finally the “Result” which is the outcome solutions. For example, in sciences, if we know that there are stars in the sky, and if we know the natural laws the govern their movement, then we can predict where they will be in certain point of time. This example aims to illustrate the reasoning process where we know all its elements of the premise (figure 5).

In the inductive (Figure 6 – part a) premise, we know “What” elements we have, and the “Result” we need to reach, but we don’t know the how we can reach the result.  Deductive ( (Figure 6 – part b)) involves understanding the “what” in a given situation, which refers to the relevant players we need to focus on. It also involves understanding the “how,” which pertains to how these elements will interact and behave together. By grasping both aspects, we can make accurate predictions about the outcomes. For example, if we have knowledge about the presence of stars in the sky and possess an understanding of the governing laws of their motion, we can confidently predict the precise location of a star at a specific time. 

Kees Dorst design reasoning
Figure 6. Different design reasoning for the relation between problems and solutions.

The third type, abductive reasoning, is commonly practiced in design and productive professions, where the end result is not a statement of fact but a provided value. This type of reasoning comes with two forms. The first one is commonly used in problem solving  (Figure 6 – part c). In this context, we possess knowledge of both the desired “Value” we aim to create and the specific “How” or working principle that can facilitate to create. However, what remains absent is the identification of the “What”, which is the system that will provide clarity and delineation to both the problem itself and the potential solution space. It is through defining this “What” that we can establish a framework within which we can actively seek answers and explore potential solutions. The second type of abduction  (Figure 6 – part d) reasoning is more ambiguous and fuzzy as we only know the value that need to be created but we lack the knowledge of what needs to be created to achieve this value or the method to create it. This model is commonly associated with conceptual design. 

Research Through Design

In the final type of design research, design is used as a tool for research., a vehicle for research to answer questions. Think of design in this case as an equipment for researchers to collect data, which is the ultimate goal of the practice. For example, Fitbit has been used to collect vital data about employees and military personal in order to monitor their health during the daily practice. These data are then used to optimise their practice and improve the diet provided for them. 

digital healthcare innovation
Figure 7. MySugr is a self-administered digital healthcare app to manage Type I and Type II diabetes conditions.

Another example for the research through design is the diabetes health management apps. Several clinicians provide access to health management mobile apps for their patients to help help improve their diet and monitor their health status, which can help them to understand their health behaviour outside the clinically controlled environment. In this case, the mobile health app is not the goal of the process, it is a tool to collect data about patient behaviour to use it in the clinical practice.


As a designer, we can’t fully appreciate the role of design research in the design process without having a clear understanding to this role and its value in the design thinking process. The classification of the design research types can help us to identify the optimum approach to take while conducting the design research and the extend of the research in the design project especially it can be costly for companies to apply properly. Therefore, it is crucial to know what type of research needed, the tools required to conduct the research, and most importantly the limitation for the research. 


Brown, T. and Katz, B. (2011) ‘Change by design’, Journal of Product Innovation Management. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00806.x.

Dorst, K. (2018) Frame Innovation, Frame Innovation. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/10096.001.0001.

Dorst, K. (2010). The nature of design thinking. In Design thinking research symposium. DAB Documents.

Frayling, C. (1994). Research in art and design (Royal College of Art Research Papers, vol 1, no 1, 1993/4).

Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2013). Design expertise. Routledge.

Dr Rafiq Elmansy

I'm an academic, author and design thinker, currently teaching design at the University of Leeds with a research focus on design thinking, design for health, interaction design and design for behaviour change. I developed and taught design programmes at Wrexham Glyndwr University, Northumbria University and The American University in Cairo. Additionally, I'm a published book author and founder of Designorate.com. I am a fellow for the Higher Education Academy (HEA), the Royal Society of Arts (FRSA), and an Adobe Education Leader. I write Adobe certification exams with Pearson Certiport. My design experience involves 20 years working with clients such as the UN, World Bank, Adobe, and Schneider. I worked with the Adobe team in developing many Adobe applications for more than 12 years.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *